Jump to content


Photo

Engagement Resolution comand decision codes mach


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Alejandro Gonzalez Ramos

Alejandro Gonzalez Ramos

    Private

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 03 August 2011 - 06:35 AM

HI:

Is there any guidelines to mach diferent command decions:

It only says Pocced down the list for each Monthly turn in order? but wich order? all japanesse comand decision first them US, or how?


what really means the no CG in the Engagement resolution table?,

Can the same sortie be attacked twice? Once during the NO carrier group and them during the sortie it was ordered (transfer, bombart, supply...), or if a US patrol sortie be attacked during the No CG, Bombart and supply japanese sorties

Japannese Bombard and supply sorties are matched to "any" and "all" allied comand decisions. What "any" and "all" means, what is their difference? Does "any" and "all" include Sortie a carrier Group?

In the description of the engagement Resolution chart D, once you get to aug-sept part (you know, no US patrol Mission a bad die rolling) Aug -sept, escort or supply mission engaged in location B. Who Engaged by Who? who I determined wich US sortie is involved?

Many questions, and this part is supossed to be the heart of the campaing system, so I refer to my first question: Is there any guideline to match comannd decisions? probably a pair of examples will be the best (you know one with carriers and another without carries)

Thank You

#2 Blue Leader

Blue Leader

    Major

  • Deactivated
  • 400 posts

Posted 03 August 2011 - 08:32 AM

HI:

Is there any guidelines to mach diferent command decions:

It only says Pocced down the list for each Monthly turn in order? but wich order? all japanesse comand decision first them US, or how?

Ithe does not matter which sideis doing the checking as the matches will still occur in order. When you come upon mission matches for both sides resolve the contacts.


what really means the no CG in the Engagement resolution table?,

"No CG" means that side has not scheduled a carrier group mission, for the turn.

Can the same sortie be attacked twice? Once during the NO carrier group and them during the sortie it was ordered (transfer, bombart, supply...), or if a US patrol sortie be attacked during the No CG, Bombart and supply japanese sorties

An Allied mission cannot be attacked during a Kaigun no CG entry, because there is no Japanese Carrier mission scheduled with which to attack.

Japanese Bombard and supply sorties are matched to "any" and "all" allied comand decisions. What "any" and "all" means, what is their difference? Does "any" and "all" include Sortie a carrier Group?

Sorry for the confusion. The Engagement Resolution Chart lists which missions interact, carrier groups are involved only in A-C. The Engagement Resolution Chart is the final word on which missions are interacting. Therte is no functional difference between "any" and "all."

In the description of the engagement Resolution chart D, once you get to aug-sept part (you know, no US patrol Mission a bad die rolling) Aug -sept, escort or supply mission engaged in location B. Who Engaged by Who? who I determined wich US sortie is involved?

In Engagement "D" The currently active Truk Bombardment mission engages the Allied supply mission and any escort with it on a 1-4 on a D12.

Many questions, and this part is supossed to be the heart of the campaing system, so I refer to my first question: Is there any guideline to match comannd decisions? probably a pair of examples will be the best (you know one with carriers and another without carries)

Thank You

The order is used without regard to which side. You go down the list until you get a situation involving the listed forces for both sides. For example, if the IJN has no carriers sortied and the Allies do, then you go to Engagement Resolution "B" and resolve that fully to see if there is an air strike on an IJN surface force. Next after that would be "any" Allied surface force vs a Bombardment force From Truk, if one was scheduled, and that would be resolved under Engagement Resolution "D." Following that would be all Allied surface forces vs a Kaigun Bombardment force from Rabaul if there is one scheduled. You look at both side's missions to determine contacts, and to determine what Engagement Resolution to use, if any. You would not simply look at one perspective, For example if there are any Kaigun Supply missions you would go to Engagement "F," to resolve, if there are unengaged Allied Patrols or Bombardments, then there is the possibility of contact. The list at the end of each chapter is there to tell you where to go on the Engagement Resolution Chart. The only results involving carrier groups are typically the first three. The rest are all surface forces on both sides. I hope these explanations help. Feel free to ask additional questions.

#3 Alejandro Gonzalez Ramos

Alejandro Gonzalez Ramos

    Private

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 03 August 2011 - 12:48 PM

The order is used without regard to which side. You go down the list until you get a situation involving the listed forces for both sides. For example, if the IJN has no carriers sortied and the Allies do, then you go to Engagement Resolution "B" and resolve that fully to see if there is an air strike on an IJN surface force. Next after that would be "any" Allied surface force vs a Bombardment force From Truk, if one was scheduled, and that would be resolved under Engagement Resolution "D." Following that would be all Allied surface forces vs a Kaigun Bombardment force from Rabaul if there is one scheduled. You look at both side's missions to determine contacts, and to determine what Engagement Resolution to use, if any. You would not simply look at one perspective, For example if there are any Kaigun Supply missions you would go to Engagement "F," to resolve, if there are unengaged Allied Patrols or Bombardments, then there is the possibility of contact. The list at the end of each chapter is there to tell you where to go on the Engagement Resolution Chart. The only results involving carrier groups are typically the first three. The rest are all surface forces on both sides. I hope these explanations help. Feel free to ask additional questions.


This really helps a lot.

One more question:


Japanesse select a second Carrier group without a carrier (japan has no carriers). US have a two Carrier sortie. Is this a "go to" engagement "A" or engagement "B"?.

If result is Engagement "B", may I join both carriers and roll only once on Engagement "B" for both carriers?, or May I separate the carriers and proceed with Egagement "B" twice?

Thanks

#4 Blue Leader

Blue Leader

    Major

  • Deactivated
  • 400 posts

Posted 03 August 2011 - 12:58 PM

This really helps a lot.

One more question:


Japanesse select a second Carrier group without a carrier (japan has no carriers). US have a two Carrier sortie. Is this a "go to" engagement "A" or engagement "B"?.

If result is Engagement "B", may I join both carriers and roll only once on Engagement "B" for both carriers?, or May I separate the carriers and proceed with Engagement "B" twice?

Thanks

This is Engagement 'A.' 'B' is only used for no carrier on one side.

Cheers,
Blue Leader




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users